No one does bad like we do: UN: Israel is worst violator of health rights in the world

Priceless.

Hillel Neuer, executive director of UN Watch penned an incredible article on a vote taken at the UN yesterday:

“As Israeli hospitals continue their life-saving treatment for escalating numbers of wounded Syrians fleeing to the Golan from the Assad regime’s barbaric attacks, the U.N. reached new heights of absurdity today by accusing Israel of violating the health rights of Syrians in the Golan.

IDF Training drill Ashdod (1)

Image: Shutterstock

By a vote of 104 to 4, with 6 abstentions and 65 absent, the Jewish state was singled out as the world’s top violator of health rights by the annual assembly of the U.N.’s World Health Organization.

The resolution, which adopted two reports heaping blame upon Israel for allegedly violating the health rights of both the Palestinians and Druze residents of the Golan, was the 2015 assembly’s only treatment of a specific country situation.

There was no debate on the health of the Yemeni people now under indiscriminate Saudi bombardment, no mention at all of the 1,850 Yemenis killed, the 7,394 wounded, and the 545,000 displaced, many of whom are desperate to find food.”

Hillel Neuer did, however, agree that ” the UN health assembly should single out Israel—as a beacon of humanity.”

Don’t miss the rest: read more on the UN Watch Blog.

Breaking the silence on the self-loathing Jewish defamers of Israel

IDF Soldier

Photo: Shutterstock

It’s time to address the issue of how anti-Israel organizations are funded in Israel. The most recent report by a small Israeli NGO, Breaking the Silence, on the conduct of Israeli soldiers during the Gaza War only underscores the urgency of this matter.

These are the words of Isi Liebler, former chairman of the World Jewish Congress, the New-York-based international federation of Jewish communities. Here is a great column by this longtime Jewish leader:

“Most of us are thoroughly exasperated with the obnoxious Jewish deviants who are demonizing Israel with their global campaigns, falsely defaming the IDF as monsters and war criminals. Such reprehensible elements were always the bane of the Jewish people. But today the Internet and the global media provide them with the opportunity to inflict infinitely greater damage than in the past, when their impact was more localized.

During the Middle Ages, some of the most venomous anti-Semitic propaganda emanated from self-loathing Jews, principally converts to Christianity, who represented an important element compounding the prevailing atmosphere of persecution, pogroms and expulsion.

In the 19th century, Karl Marx, who was born a Jew, spouted obscene anti-Semitic diatribes which his Jewish followers simply refused to acknowledge. In Russia in the 1880s, it was Jewish Social Revolutionaries who justified pogroms as incubators which would transform the masses into revolutionaries.

After the Bolshevik Revolution, the Soviet-appointed Yevsetskia (Jewish cadres) were more vicious than their gentile counterparts in demonizing and proscribing Judaism. More recently, during the Cold War, Diaspora Jewish communists defended Stalin as he murdered their kinsmen and applauded the Soviet regime which promoted state-sponsored anti-Semitism.

Today, there are a small group of Jews and Israelis who maintain this demented tradition of self-loathing by defaming the entire Jewish nation by seeking to portray the Israel Defense Forces – undoubtedly the most moral army in the world – as craven war criminals.

The principal Jewish group currently promoting this blood libel is a small Israeli NGO, Breaking the Silence, which was established in 2004 with the clear objective of undermining Israel. Its strategy is to defame the IDF, dramatizing “evidence” of alleged war crimes. However their “eyewitness reports” are anonymous, unverifiable and devoid of context.

Many of the alleged “crimes” were subsequently exposed as comprising anti-Israeli chatter with no basis in reality.

Indeed, allegations accusing the IDF of engaging in Cossack-like killing sprees were highlighted in cover stories by Haaretz in mid-2009 and subsequently syndicated as front-page stories in newspapers throughout the world. They were very soon proven to have been without substance. But the damage was done and the climate was created, paving the way for the notorious Goldstone Report which accused Israel of war crimes.

Today we are witnessing a replay. Breaking the Silence has released a 237-page report of “testimonies” by unnamed Israeli combatants describing alleged war crimes during the recent war in Gaza.

Again, citing anonymous sources and without context, these unsubstantiated accusations, which effectively describe the IDF and Hamas as birds of a feather, made worldwide headlines. They undoubtedly represent a curtain raiser for the forthcoming United Nations Human Rights Commission report, which promises to be as biased and as distorted as the discredited Goldstone report. The campaign is also intended to encourage the International Criminal Court to prosecute Israel for war crimes.

Of course war is horrendous, mistakes are made and innocent civilians become casualties. This applies especially in Gaza with Hamas, which aside from launching rockets and digging tunnels to murder and kidnap Israelis, also deliberately used civilians as human shields and located rocket and artillery launching pads and arms depots in densely populated locations including schools, hospitals, mosques and UN shelters.

If Israel had wantonly sought to kill civilians, it would not drop millions of leaflets and telephone hundreds of thousands of civilians urging them to evacuate areas four hours in advance of airborne attacks.

However, that is not to suggest that the IDF, even with its unique moral code of combat, is perfect.

But there are procedures in Israel for dealing with legitimate complaints or infringements of the law.

The judge advocate general systematically investigates every accusation, and there were exceptional cases which led to prosecution of offenders. But there are no cover-ups and there has not been a single case of behavior that could be described as a malicious intent to kill a civilian without cause.

Had Breaking the Silence submitted evidence that was confirmed by the judge advocate general, who then failed to act, they would have been justified in condemning and protesting against the state. But they adamantly refused to either identify those primarily low-ranking soldiers charging the IDF with war crimes or provide details of these allegations to enable their claims to be investigated by the relevant authority.

Yet they have the gall to justify circulating such unverifiable defamatory allegations on the outrageous grounds that whistleblowers would be “punished,” something inconceivable in a country which has a free press and would have a field day if there were an attempt to cover up any such incident.

Under normal circumstances, no responsible reporter or newspaper would risk publicizing such charges if prevented from verifying their veracity. Yet these monstrous libels against Israel are reproduced as though Breaking the Silence was a responsible government instrumentality or a transparent respectable human rights organization.

The problem is compounded by the fact that the bulk of funding for Breaking the Silence comes from anti-Israel NGOs, human rights associations, foreign foundations and European governments, many of whom are engaged in boycott divestment and sanctions (BDS). Some actually made their grants conditional on obtaining a minimum number of negative “testimonies.”

Tens of millions of euros originate from European governments, including the United Kingdom, which would never conceivably tolerate such foreign interference in its own domestic arena by external organizations – especially governmental bodies – seeking to subvert a democratic government under the cloak of promoting human rights. This is documented in detail in a recent NGO Monitor publication titled NGOs, Anti-Semitism and Government Funding.

The demonization and delegitimization of Israel by Jews funded by anti-Israeli groups abroad is neither an academic exercise nor an exchange of views. It is an act of sabotage, endangering the state and as pernicious as sabotaging IDF weapons depots. It would not be tolerated in any other democratic country, particularly one surrounded by neighbors fanatically committed to its destruction.

It is indisputable that the objective of Breaking the Silence is not merely criticism of Israeli policies.

After all, self-criticism, sometimes even extending to masochism, is a central feature of Israel’s robust democratic ethos. However, Breaking the Silence, a small group of disgruntled delusionary Israeli leftists backed by massive overseas funding, is unashamedly demonizing Israel throughout the world and undermining its government. It sends out emissaries to vilify Israel among Jewish and non-Jewish groups, particularly at universities. It is shameful that, purporting to uphold freedom of expression and maintain dialogue, some Hillel bodies even provide platforms for their representatives to defame the IDF.

To besmirch a nation by falsely portraying its soldiers as craven murderers undermines national morale. It is in this context that the proposal mooted by Ayelet Shaked, now justice minister, to require government approval for overseas NGOs to sponsor Israeli political bodies has considerable merit, despite the shrieks that democracy would be undermined.

Just as individuals can resort to legal means to remedy defamation, the state must also defend itself from demented citizens engaged in defamation of their country. This applies especially to Israel, the sole democratic oasis in a region in which barbarism is rampant and whose right to exist continues to be challenged by its neighbors.”

The writer’s website can be viewed at www.wordfromjerusalem.com.

View the original article here.

Illinois is Boycotting Israel’s Boycotters – and BDS is not happy

Boycott Israel (3)

Photo: Shutterstock

Yesterday, the Illinois House of Representatives unanimously passed a piece of legislation that requires the state’s pension system to shun companies that refuse to do business with Israel.

The bill will prohibit all companies participating in the BDS (Boycott, Divestment and Sanction) campaign from receiving state funding for Illinois state pension funds.

Ironically, BDS doesn’t like the boycotting tactic when it is used against them:

Donald Wagner and Ghada Hashem Talhami, writing in the Sun-Times, complain that the measure would “force state retirement systems to expend resources investigating, blacklisting, and withdrawing funds from companies that boycott Israel in protest of its occupation and denial of rights for Palestinians.” But they seem to have no concern about state retirement systems expending resources to withdraw funds from companies that don’t boycott Israel.

‘How ironic that they are seeking to boycott a boycott movement,’ they say. But it’s at least equally paradoxical for supporters of a boycott to decry a counter-boycott.”

According to Northwestern University School of Law Professor Eugene Kontorovich, recent panelist at Shurat HaDin’s Towards a New Law of War Conference, the significance of this bill could be bigger than the state of Illinois:

European countries have in recent years been whispering dark threats in corporate ears about the “legal and economic risks” of doing business with Israeli companies. The vagueness of these warnings is a testament to their legal groundlessness. But such scare tactics could not help but affect, at the margin, corporate decision-making. Now, the EU will – if it is honest – have to warn businesses of the legal and economic risks of consciously refusing to do business with such Israeli companies.

More generally, the Illinois bill is part of a broad political revulsion over the long-simmering BDS movement (“Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions” – the strategy of economic warfare and delegitimization against Israel). While BDS has gotten most of its successes with low-hanging fruit like British academic unions and pop singers, the anti-boycott efforts are getting an enthusiastic reception in real governments, on the state and federal level. And that is because the message of the BDS movement – Israel as a uniquely villainous state – is fundamentally rejected by the vast majority of Americans.

Indeed, a wave of anti-BDS legislation is sweeping the U.S. The most high-profile so far are the bipartisan amendments to congressional bills for Trade Promotion Authority. They establish the “discourage[ing]” of boycotts as one of the U.S.’s many goals in trade negotiations with European countries.

The trade amendments do not take any definite action against boycotters. But they clearly establish that in the eyes of America, the BDS is not like the civil rights protests, as its supporters love to claim, but rather more like the anti-Jewish boycotts so common in Europe in the 20th century, and in the Arab world until this day. Indeed, two state legislatures have in recent weeks passed resolutions saying just that.

Read more here and here.